‘Historic Win’: CHD Wins Case Against FCC on Safety Guidelines for 5G and Wireless

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit court ruled the Federal Communications Commission failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its current guidelines adequately protect against harmful effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) won its historic case today against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), a case challenging the agency’s decision not to review its 1996 health and safety guidelines regarding wireless-based technologies including 5G.

Watch press event which was held on Monday, Aug. 16 at 10 a.m. PT/1 p.m. ET.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit published its decision Aug.13. The court ruled that the FCC failed to consider the non-cancer evidence regarding adverse health effects of wireless technology when it decided that its 1996 radiofrequency emission guidelines protect the public’s health.

The court’s judgment states:

“The case be remanded to the commission to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect against harmful effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation…”

CHD Chairman and attorney on the case Robert F Kennedy, Jr. said:

“The court’s decision exposes the FCC and FDA as captive agencies that have abandoned their duty to protect public health in favor of a single-minded crusade to increase telecom industry profits.”

CHD’s case was consolidated with another similar case that was filed by the Environmental Health Trust. The organizations filed joint briefs in the case.

CHD’s lead attorney for the case, Scott McCollough, a telecommunication and administrative law attorney who represented the petitioners in the hearing, said:

“This is an historic win. The FCC will have to re-open the proceeding and for the first time meaningfully and responsibly confront the vast amount of scientific and medical evidence showing that current guidelines do not adequately protect health and the environment.

The court’s decision continued to say:

“…the FCC completely failed to acknowledge, let alone respond to, comments concerning the impact of RF radiation on the environment…The record contains substantive evidence of potential environmental harms.”

The petitioners in the case filed 11,000 pages of evidence of harm from 5G and wireless technology which the FCC ignored, including evidence of already existing widespread sickness.

Click Here to Read More..

Read more

Categories FCC

The City of Boise, Ada County should follow the State of New Hampshire recommendations before proceeding with its 5G Small Cell Deployment

The State of New Hampshire was put into the same predicament that the City of Boise, Ada County and ACHD is facing right now. After hearing testimony of potential health risks and the political ramifications of small cell antennae being deployed on the public rights-of-way throughout New Hampshire, agreed that a Commission be formed to … Read more

Landmark EMR Lawsuit CHD vs FCC (case number 20-1025) and the biological effects of RF exposure.

COMPILED BY MIRIAM LINDBECK, EMRS “The present FCC thermal regulation, in addition to lacking any sound scientific foundation, as pointed out by Petitioners, is perpetrating a continuing, ever-expanding, and cruel injustice.” – Building Biology Institute CHD vs FCC Children’s Health Defense vs Federal Communications Commission with EHT (Environmental Health Trust) In the early Spring of 2020, … Read more

The FCC does not protect Public Health and Safety! Read it for yourself..

The FCC does not protect Public Health and Safety. It is the responsibility of NEPA, FDA & EPA. Below are FAQ directly from the FCC’s website. All City, County Planning department must require NEPA review on all Cell Facilities. FCC – RF Safety FAQ WHY HAS THE FCC ADOPTED GUIDELINES FOR RF EXPOSURE? The FCC … Read more

NEPA Review of all 5G/Small Cells

PUBLISHED JANUARY 15, 2020 Citizens for 5G Awareness A recent court ruling examined the requirement for a Federal review for the placement of 5G small cell towers under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The court overruled the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) arguments in favor of Native American tribes, giving them and all cities the right to require NEPA … Read more

Historic Legal Action Against The FCC On Cell Phone And Wireless Health Effects

Re-Post from Environmental Health Trust EHT Takes Historic Legal Action Against The FCC Appeal filed after the FCC refuses to update their 24 year old wireless radiation limits.  Washington, DC – A group of scientists, consumer health nonprofits, and citizens filed a historic legal action against the FCC for its refusal to update its 24-year-old cell phone … Read more

Categories FCC

Two Recent Court Wins

1: United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians, et al v. FCC, 933 F.3d 728 (D.C. Cir., Aug 19, 2019). “This was the D.C. Circuit’s reversal and vacatur of the FCC’s decision to completely excuse small cell deployments from environmental and historic-preservation review. The court held FCC did not adequately address possible harms of deregulation and benefits … Read more

Categories FCC

FCC – Captured Agency

The Harvard Edmund J. Safra Center for Ethics published an expose “Captured Agency”  by investigative journalist Norm Alster on the financial ties between the US federal government’s  Federal communications Commission (FCC) and how, as a result, the wireless industry has bought inordinate access to—and power over—a major US regulatory agency. Alster describes how  the FCC is a “captured … Read more